Rsx Wannabe· Registered
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
anybody kno of any good lancer forums such as this? I kno this is a rsx site but im in a delema as to which car to get, lancer or rsx.so does any1 kno of any good lancer sites?
im 17 my parents r paying for the car. so i have a choice of lancer-$15000 add turbo,intake,etc for the price of base rsx-$20000 or so with the same or higher hp.SoLoSpEeD101 said:you are stupid...if its not the EVO that you are comparing it with the RSX than you are stupid...
:iamwiths:If your not talking about getting the EVO, then get the RSX. The base lancer is like Mitsubishi's Civic.
:iamwiths:you do realize that just strapping on a turbo to a lancer won't make it an evo, or come anywhere close.
dc5guy said:mitsubishi is nothing but a big peice of shit, i hate them with a passion. they make TV's! and dude the lancer is complet joke, some guy named Klutch ran a 14.7 in the quarter with a stock base rsx, and you want to put a turbo on that piece of lancer doodoo. anything that honda makes will always be better then mitsubishi. sure the EVO has a turbo on it, but its factory, and hey u no if u put a turbo on the rsx, it will run faster then the EVO. for instance, the evo i think has like 15 psi stock and it runs like a 13.6 at best stock. some guy on club rsx pulled a 12.5 with his rsx at only 9 psi. stage 1 turbo and all. and now some guy who runs the same amount of boost 17psi i think ran a 11.9 orsomething, dude mitsubishi is ugly piece of shit nothing but junk cars that they only try so hard to compete in the world, and they still suck. my 2 cents
ecks said:The stock EVO is not at 15psi, I dont know what it is at but I doubt it is 15.
you got nothing to laugh about buddy, ive seen srt-4s spanking EVOs left and right...just with the mopar stage 1 and i believe it still makes less power than the stock EVO...EVOVIII said:how come there is always an IDIOT, and talk things he doent even know about :dontknow: DOU YOU EVEN KNOW WHAT TORQUE IS? I guess not :shakehead
15psi? eeeeeeeeeeehehehehehehe what a moron.
Lets not talk about the EVO, a friking srt4 will eat you alive! you hear that? A NEONNNNNNNNNN baaaaaaaaaahahahahahaha :finger:
cybernation uses a T3/T4, 60-1 or 62-1 Turbo...is the 60-1 the same thing as a T61?...but anyways it is prolly bigger than the 16g...dc5guy said:just sayin you put a turbo on an rsx it will beat the freakin evo no questions asked, i already stated the people who did, with less psi, but i dont know how big a turbo is on mitsubishi, i think u said 14g or whatever, he had a t61 (i think thats what cybernation uses) anyway its a big turbo. i dont know if its the same size as the evo turbo, but my point was simply the rsx is a better car, cas hwere i live there are 3 evos and they may be fast, but hell if i were to have a turbo, i bet my money i could beat the evo.
Hehe I drove an 85 civic hatch when i was in high school... upgraded to a 98 civic coupe for first year and half at college, then bought my rsx a year ago in march....SoLoSpEeD101 said:you got nothing to laugh about buddy, ive seen srt-4s spanking EVOs left and right...just with the mopar stage 1 and i believe it still makes less power than the stock EVO...
cybernation uses a T3/T4, 60-1 or 62-1 Turbo...is the 60-1 the same thing as a T61?...but anyways it is prolly bigger than the 16g...
evos in my opinion are beautiful cars...they have HIDs, recaros, momos, brembos, AWD, and the all-mighty turbo...but i dunno if i want to ride around an engine that is about 25 years old and boosting 19.5 psi(thats a little way too high for the power it makes if you ask me)...the 4g63 might be "bulletproof" but ive heard a lot about mitsubishi's quality...and i aint good things either...dont get me wrong, i would take an EVO in a heart beat but that is only if i can get one for free...i dont mind paying the amount of money i pay for a Type S since i know of their quality...i mean i still see hondas from the 70s still running strong...